上学期性别课应该配这部电影的。本来只想看诗人，没想到最后是vv那么夺目。
The whole film demonstrates the idea of institutionalized power/discourse, a typical foucaultian instance of constructed madness, and perfectly exemplifies how a British female can be exiled from public space, induced by male-favoured legislation in the discouse of 20th century. Also, this is how biopolitics works within a patriarchal society.
最后，电影的隐喻和呼应都精彩极了。
谁愿意被爱的人放弃呢，医生们来后问的第二个问题，维维看向艾略特，而艾略特选择了沉默。这阵沉默维维彻底明白自己被放弃被囚禁。
在疯人院的维维回归了正常，但整整十年艾略特都未曾去看过维维，但维维依然记得他喜欢的是巧克力。艾略特要真的爱她，为什么不说。分明是他也不想面对这样的妻子，曾经炙热的爱，爱维维的真心确实真真实实存在过。但维维被囚禁的十年，他确实已经放下了，他无法面对自己的内心吧。
第二任妻子，你的内心不会自己比较吗，他的生活中绝对有维维的影子。
女生本就敏感多虑
用福柯的话说： 疯癫在各个方面都使人们迷恋。它所产生的怪异图像不是那种转瞬即逝的事物表面的现象。那种从最奇特谵妄状态所产生的东西，就像一个秘密，一个无法接近的真理，早已隐藏在地表下面。这是从艺术的角度，而在最世俗的生活，就只会产生灾难。
老太太叠女儿衣服的时候和tom说的这段话，很喜欢：“这些底层的人就是英式生活的中心，把八卦变成艺术，写着关于朋友们的恶俗小说，这难道不是成就吗？黑格伍德家的人已经被埋葬了，远在阿尔伯塔和尼泊尔的地方，地方法官教堂看守，真是一点都不时尚”
“AT SOME point in their marriage Tom Eliot went mad and promptly certified his wife.”
That’s what Edith Sitwell said to Michael Hastings before he wrote this absorbing, moving play in 1984, and, if Tom and Viv is to believed, she had a point. Eliot’s first wife was mischievous, erratic and sometimes pretty peculiar. But was T. S., who had vowed undying love for her, justified in so utterly abandoning a woman who could claim to be his muse, or at least his Dark Lady?
But then, as Hastings concedes in his intro to the text, Tom and Viv isn’t wholly to be believed. The play belongs to that increasingly popular but deeply questionable genre, speculative biography, or “faction”.
诗人与他的情人：诗人之爱与爱人之诗
转载请注明网址: https://www.livechatworks.com/dy/id-15842.html
